So what happens now? Well, the printed remarks and the personal information go before a judge for review. I don't know how things work in your states and countries but New Jersey is very adamant about prosecuting these matters. The judge will then review the private information and libelous remarks. He might determine all or some of it is worthy of prosecution. Don't worry - the possibility of a judge determing "all" of it should be thrown out is impossible. There were some textbook violations committed here. Then the judge declares disclosure and this information is passed along to law enforcement agencies in your respective states and countries. You're then served papers and notification that you've been named in a lawsuit. Extradition isn't really important. We won't need you to be present to explain your remarks. We have them in printed and in web-published form. You can feel free to attend at your own expense and try to explain away your remarks if you'd like. At the conclusion of this a judgment will be awarded. It might be $1.00 in my favor or... you might work the rest of your lives while paying off a wage garnishment.
It seems that at least one of you believes I'll have to disprove everything you've said about me in order to be victorious in this matter. That's just not how it works. However, your neophyte explanations of the law and how it works are extremely amusing to professional lawyers. Once again - this isn't about ME or MY BOOKS. This is quite specifically about what YOU HAVE POSTED AND PRINTED ABOUT ME. They really are separate issues. This is also about the packages sent to my home, the harassing phone calls I've received, the sharing of my private information and a pornographic image that was emailed to us. Had you kept this about the books and not made it personal, things would have been ok for you. But you didn't. You took it a few steps beyond reasonable complaining and attacked me. That's what this is about.
I'd like to close today's post with a few references to Ornebridges' claim that I allegedly posted profiles for him on "multiple" sex web sites. Truth be told, I didn't. His profile on "Sex In The U.K." came up by an associate of mine when running a basic google search for "Ornebridges".
If I posted that profile of Ornebridges, his Feldgrau.com cronies and anyone reading this blog or the Amazon comments must answer these questions:
- Why would I have allegedly created that profile for him MONTHS before my path crossed with his?
- How did I know his private email address?
- How did I know his location?
- How did I know his private TextChat ID?
- Why does the page now read: "Ornebridges Has Deleted His Profile" rather than "Profile Deleted", "Profile Deleted By Moderators", etc??
- How and Why would the moderators of the web site delete a profile simply based on a random complaint from someone?
I took the steps to contact the web site to learn what their policy is for deleting an account. I encourage you to do the same thing to see that Ornebridges is lying about this. First of all, Ornebridges claimed this profile was opened from an American IP address. Sorry Ornebridges. It wasn't. Not according to Sex In The U.K. anyway. Nice try. The site administrators will only cancel a profile internally if they feel it's abuse of their system. In this case, the USER deleted the profile. End of story.
No comments:
Post a Comment