An Informative Day

Well... tomorrow is Labor Day! And there's so much more for me to celebrate than I ever imagined! The celebration comes from what I learned today. Oh what a busy, busy Sunday this has been.

It started with a telephone call to my internet service provider. They were very interested in hearing how email accounts were hacked, information taken, reproduced, and shared. They "pinged" my computer and ran a reverse search for interference. What they came up with was astounding! And they used a word to decribe it.... Not only that, they ran searches on remote access histories and traced quite a few interesting breaches of my privacy. The wonderful tech helping me, Nicole was her name, suggested forwarding the findings to law enforcement since people who do this kind of thing mainly do it for identity theft. Of course there's no proof of that but there IS proof of passwords being entered from IPs I can't physically have access to. Isn't that interesting?

So off to my local law enforcement office I went. I know, I know... bummer having to do that on a Holiday Weekend but what the heck right? I mean, I also learned that my family members are being harassed by phone calls from Ireland. However, the caller didn't get far. And my family member has no intention of calling you back as requested. And we're all on the same page here. Oh and not only that, but I also learned a hostile person from my past opened a floodgate and directed a few individuals to contact people I haven't seen or talked to in almost 25 years. I wonder what that telephone bill will look like?

Anyhow, the officer was extremely interested in all this. There's a line between Free Speech and physical harassment. That line was crossed. All these silly claims that my books are fakes constitutes a civil matter. Harassment equals a criminal matter. Interesting, huh? I'm very grateful for the education I received today. It seems that if I want to, I can sign complaints against those who are (and who have) harassed me either via the internet or by sending packages and making phone calls. Not only phone calls to me - but phone calls to my family members. You see, they're not interested in what you have to say. According to legal counsel out of Collingswood, I have six names (and addresses) worthy of signing complaints against. Should I do this?? Hmmm... maybe I'll take the holiday to think about it. If I sign these complaints, a summons gets issued to each of you either via certified mail or delivered by a constable or law enforcement officer. Then it's up to you to answer the summons. Oh, you can ignore it if you choose to. After all, it would be issued out of New Jersey and have no real bearing in a foreign country or another state. Or would it? Hmmm.... apparently - if you ignore it - if you're stopped for speeding, asked to show your documents or ID, it'll come up that you have an outstanding summons. Who knows what happnes then? The officer and I had so much to discuss that we didn't get into those details.

But oh those 6 individuals (and this number may increase)... sadly we only have work addresses for a couple of them. I guess they might be served at work. That would be shameful. Don't you agree?

And what about these individuals being in foreign countries and different states? That's where notification of the FBI came in. They're VERY interested in threats, harassment and cyber-stalking. What exactly IS cyber-stalking? Well... apparently that happens when someone hacks email accounts, uses passwords from alternate IP addresses, collects email communications, posts, prints and reports them to others, and uses information gained from the internet to make unsolicited, unwanted telephone calls to individuals who are offended by them. Family friends and neigbors may have responded to these calls but some have since felt violated by them. I love it.

So Al, Mike, Phil, Pete, Fred, Bob, Tony (and a few others)... professional law enforcement has been notified of your harassment. What IS harassment by federal terms? The sending of unsolicited emails, telephone calls, mailing of packages, overtly published internet statements stated as fact rather than opinion, and overt encouragment to incite others to cause me harm. Whatever you said about the books and their contents is 100% protected by the 1st Amendment. But your extracurricular activities of phoning people, publishing private information, publishing credit information, calling my home, sending packages to my home, entering passwords, accessing private email accounts and web sites is - according to law enforcement - illegal. You lose.

But my day didn't stop there. The kind and informative police officer (by the way, I spoke with the New Jersey State Police at approximately 1:30pm today - in person) and the Lower Township Police Department (approximately 11:50pm - in person) suggested that since all you folks are in different states and countries, that I contact the FBI. I mentioned this earlier in my post (see above if you've since forgotten). A formal complaint will be filed tomorrow morning at approximately 8:30am. Use your super-duper computer skills to track the reports. You've crossed the line and screwed up so, so bad. If you're ever able to actually "prove" that my books are fakes you'll have a civil suit against me. I find it highly amusing that I have a legitimate criminal case against 6 or 10 of you. If you're actually able to convince a court that my books are fakes, I'd end up paying a fine. But in my case against you - you could very possibly end up going to jail. More B.S. from Harker's "sockpuppets"? Nope. Legit information from professional law enforcement.

Have a nice day!!!

An Apology To Feldgrau, Axis, and Gibson - And A "Thank You"

Well what can I say? For some time now I've regarded Feldgrau, Axis and Gibson as nemesis components in an ugly exchange of words and emotions. However, after today, I owe each of you an apology. I'm truly sorry if anything I said offended any one of you.

And now I must thank you. The controversy you generated about me and my books made this past sales quarter a STELLAR SUCCESS! Consumers - now armed with the "professional caveat" you placed in your reviews, threads and comments, are making the conscious decision to purchase my books to see and judge the content for themselves! I couldn't have asked for better promotion for the books than what you've given me. Your "panel of "experts" and published military historians" posted and published their "learned opinions" of my works while calling me a "huckster, fraud, fake and criminal". For this, you have my sincere thanks. You informed the public of your opinion, slaughtered my name in the process, and now people want to read the books BECAUSE of your opinions! More so because of the negativity you've assigned to them! So thank you! Keep doing what you're doing! You've become a free promotional tool for my books! You've created a wildfire of controversy that's burning in my favor! It's amazing to think of all the people who've heard of me and my books simply by reading your reviews, comments and threads! Your reviews, threads and comments have propagated my name and titles. Why would I need "sockpuppets" when I have YOU guys trumpeting my works to the world? And in a way that makes people curious enough to read them? Remember here - by your own words - "You're the "experts" complete with "management" and according to you I'm the "huckster, fraud, fake and criminal." You've claimed an "expertise" with which to post your caveats and people are buying my books in scores to pit what you've had to say against what a "common Joe" has done. I can't thank you enough!! I was surprised to see the quarterly figures! You guys are awesome!!!

And to think I was getting annoyed with all of you! How silly of me! Ornebridges, Gibson, Miller - forgive me! You've done more to help me than you'll ever know! But does this mean I'm dropping the libel suit? Nope. I have too much invested in that to let it go. But thanks again! You guys did me a tremendous service!!

Gibson Bores Me

Gibby bores me with his garbage. I was going to comment on his blog but I realize he's not worth dealing with simply because he can't write three sentences without using some kind of childish cussword. Cusswords are simply noise. Just placeholders without any meaning. And that dictates the rest of his comments. They don't mean anything. Gibby might be taken seriously if his goal was to communicate ideas in a way that is convincing. He needs to be wise about how people hear things. The words he chooses, and his condescending tone, cause readers to throw up their defenses in general because he's failed to be convincing. He should make a grown up effort to put his arguments and words in such a way that people can hear and appreciate them, not in ways that cause them to stop listening or want to leave. But I'm sure he'll learn these techniques once he grows up. Plus it's uncreative. People who use foul language as expressions of whatever they are feeling at the moment forsake far more creative ways to say it. People who use it are limiting themselves to a very small, undesirable portion of all language. People who use it show that they are ignorant enough not to know to use something better. Gibby uses it for shock value and to be heard. He craves attention. Then again it also illustrates the lack of education and life experience this poor person has. Yet he deems himself worthy to be my critic? Whatever. His negative attention seeking behavior bores me.

And yes Gibby - your grammar. It's atrocious. If you're going to waste time trying to sound professional you should at least make an attempt to be articulate.

Peter Gibson????? dr WHO???

Well we're starting to connect the dots here. Right now it looks like "Peter Gibson" is an Ornebridges sockpuppet. No one's heard of this so-called "media researcher" and he misspells words and cusses just like Orney. He "claims" to be a professional but he can't blog without profanity, grammar errors and 4th grade style spelling errors. Not quite the type of person you'd imagine working for a television network. Not to mention he makes the same childish "Dr. Who" references. Why all the cussing and big bold letters? Ahh... that's classic Orney style in needing to be heard and needing attention. Let me ask you - are cusswords and big, bold, colorful letters the mark of a "professional"?? Nope! Not a chance!

About the Dr. Who references made by "Peter Gibson", here are a few from Orney:


Re: Let Me Enetrtain You
by phylor_roadking on Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:32 pm
BUT - being a BIG "Dr Who" fan, THIS is my favourite from today's exploration...Paul...if you're expecting the "Los Angeles B'Nai B'Rith Temple" to speak on behalf of "Directive 19"...1/ you'd better get their NAME right when you're talking to them, it's "Los Angeles Temple B'Nai B'Rith"....2/ and you'd better hurry...because it's amalgamating with the Wilshire Boulevard Temple...IN 1929... Note from Teacher - "must do better"...
"Many men have tried...""They tried and failed?""They tried and died."
phylo_roadking
Admin
Posts: 7276
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:41 pm


I've seen a LOT of viral advertising on the Net in the last few years - you wouldn't believe for example some of the gems the BBC pulled to advertise Dr Who! - but SURELY the whole point of it is to attract people....not repel them???
"Many men have tried...""They tried and failed?""They tried and died."
phylo_roadking
Admin
Posts: 7276
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:41 pm

And... speaking of "Chance" - if you guys were paying attention to your own astonishing shame, you'd realize that I already admitted to using the username of Chance on Axis. So what's your point about this?? It was already discussed. Years ago I mistakenly opened an account on Axis, asked some very articulate questions and my threads were "shut down" or "locked" because none of you could answer them. So I opened another account in an attempt to ask the same questions again but figured I'd have to use tiny little words and color pictures to help you understand. Especially you phylo. Friends with this "Gibson" character? More than friends perhaps?? How does Gibson just "happen" to know you?? Oh... nevermind... we know... "mate"!

This is getting boring for me now. I thought this guy was serious for a moment. Now it's not even challenging for me anymore.

Here's something else. "Peter Gibson's" email address is listed on his blog as: peter_gibson@hotmail.au.com. ANYBODY can open a free email account. I imagine a "respected media researcher from Seven Network" would have a company email or something more respectable than a free little email address.

Thanks for this charade. It's very entertaining.

A Dog??

So Gibson checked with the ASPCA and photo manipulation qualifies as Animal Cruelty? I think we got us another crackpot on our hands boys and girls.

Here's his latest joke: "I've been chatting to a WIDE range of former...acquaintances of Paul's. Strangely enough - not many have a good word to say about him."

Is that the best you can do? Apparently he's gone a step beyond with this hilarious little tidbit:

"Instead...I had a word with some of your friends and neighbours, Paul. And do you know what about??? And do you know why even some the ones you chat to, and who smile to your face...hate you? Why they were prepared to talk to me???BECAUSE ONCE I SHOWED THEM, THEY HATED WHAT YOU'D DONE TO YOUR DOG!!!"

Is that right? I'll be darned. Did you talk to the guy who brings vegetables from his garden to us? Or was it the person we share a drink with now and then? Or was it the people we socialize with on a fairly regular schedule? You'll have to get up earlier than that to try to create some kind of rift with doublespeak. The whole "smile to your face... and hate you" remark is a ploy at a clever little scheme to deceive me. But we will find out for certain this weekend. Are you an obsessed little cyber-stalker or just another lying sockpuppet associated with Feldgrau?? We'll see. You know why? Because my neighbors suggested and encouraged that picture. I was opposed to at first - not from any moral sense but I thought it was plain silly. But they encouraged it and it happened. How interesting that you baked up this wild story. You're not very good at this Gobby. Or is it Gibby? Whatever... I don't care enough to go back and correct the spelling error with your name.

Anyhow - I know my neighbors well enough to know that you're F.O.S. Keep collecting your data from a hostile ex and keep applying it and reapplying it in whatever candy-coated flavors you prefer. In fact we'll be getting together this weekend for a nice time. I'll ask them about you.

Uh huh. Folks are up in arms because of a dog wearing a steel helmet that could very well be a Spanish style helmet. Uh huh... people hate me because there's a picture of a dog wearing a helmet. *YAWN* No markings on the helmet - no insignia - just a dog wearing a helmet. And people hate me for this? Ok Gibby.... if you say so. It's obvious YOU hate me but that's your perogative.

I appreciate your obsessive interest in me. Phoning around, looking up my address, publishing private information - great stuff! Sounds to me like cyber-stalking but we'll see what the attorneys have to say next week. Have a wonderful weekend!

Amsel Enters The Mix

It's nice to know that my works and my life are of such interest to people that they sit around blogging about me all day. And now Gibons is calling Amsel a "sockpuppet" of mine. Well this is just another shamefully boring example of how much Gibson and the Feldgrau crew don't know. And it also shoots more holes in your entire campaign. Phylo listed a string of usernames that were supposedly multiple identites of mine. He claimed to have these superhuman powers to "directly ping PCs and identify folks by IP numbers". Well he's obviously lying again. If you could actually DO this, you'd know better. So your whole case of "proving Paul K. Harker has a number of sockpuppets and multiple usernames" ends up in the toilet with everything else Feldgrau and Gibons have stated. Please keep it up. I like clowns!

The Picture Is Forming

The picture is forming. Feldgrau and Gibson have stooped to calling me a "Neo Nazi" and a "Nazi War Crimes Apologist". That's an interesting but lowlife tactic to use as an attempt to sway public opinion against me and my works. To date, Feldgrau and Gibson have done nothing more than make unfounded accusations and haven't offered a single thread of hard evidence or scientific fact to prove what they're saying. Of course they've gone through my life experiences with a fine-toothed comb and have attempted to discredit me by twisting facts and information.

But all we have to do is examine the comments made by Feldgrau and Axis members on public forums such as the Amazon thread. My favorite little gems were offered by Michael (Miguel?) D. Miller who is employed as a Shasta County, California probation officer. One would think this individual would be sensitive to cultural diversity being that it's an integral part of his job. However, on the Amazon.com threads Michael D. Miller wrote several posts in reference to the Rabbi Michael Beals of the Congregation Beth Shalom of Wilmington, DE. Rabbi Beals spoke favorably about Directive 19 in a newspaper article.

Michael D. Miller wrote a post wherein he stated "Beals is a fake rabbi pimping Harker's books".

In response to a female who posted in favor of Directive 19 on the Amazon threads, Michael D. Miller posted this response to her: "Don't you have some eggs to scramble and some laundry to fold?"

It's evident where the anger, hatred, Anti-Semitism and sexist emotions are. Of course when confronted with his own statements, Micheal D. Miller changed his Amazon.com username ("sockpuppets") and hastily deleted these horrible, hurtful and damning statements. But that didn't make them go away. "Screendumps" are available. I ask you, is THIS the kind of person you'd feel comfortable with as a probation officer? If not, let the department know what you think of this behavior at:

http://www.co.shasta.ca.us/html/Probation/juvenile_division.htm

It must also be noted that Miller has sent me several childishly charming but unsolicited and harassing emails. How did he get my email address? More than likely it was inappropriately given to him by John P. Moore. In my opinion Moore is a disreputable wolf in sheep's clothing who baited me into conversation and then ran back to Feldgrau to share the information I gave him. Only he twisted and distorted the facts in an attempt to bolster their silly little campaign. Moore more than likely shared my private email address with those who sent me harassing emails thus implicating himself in the problem.

I'm looking forward to the Holiday weekend! Conversations and more legal updates will be available next week.

Peter Gibson The Revisionist???

Recently we've examined Peter Gibson and his amusing little comments. The man claims to be a researcher for Australian media who has obviously misused resources to promote what seems to be a revisionist view of the Holocaust by attacking Directive 19 and me, its humble compiler. Gibson offers no proof, scientific data or hard evidence to refute the books but rather makes ludicrous claims against Directive 19 in a most obscure and confusing manner. Gibson seems to deny the validity of Directive 19 and therefore - the Holocaust itself. Probably another Feldgrau.com "sockpuppet" but sad in a very profound way.

The folowing inquiry was issued to Melbourne Channel 7 Television:

To Whom It Concerns:
I'd like to bring your attention to a matter of libel directed at me from someone claiming to be an employee of your television station. The person in question, Peter Gibson, has publicly admitted using your company resources to post a libelous blog about me and publish private information regarding me and my family. This blog can be viewed at: http://directive-19.blogspot.com/
I am currently in the process of establishing a lawsuit against several parties and individuals for libel. I would like to know if Mr. Gibson is employed by Channel 7 and if he had professional authorization from a company superior to collect, review, and publish this data using Channel 7 resources.
I assure you this is no trivial matter. Attorneys are currently reviewing the data and it is my goal to prosecute the offenders only. If Channel 7 had no knowledge of Gibson's actions then I will not hold Channel 7 liable in this matter. However, if Mr. Gibson is an employee, and if he misused company resources for his personal campaign, I will expect notification of a reprimand or penalty imposed upon him.
Sincerely,Paul K. Harker

The above complaint was filed at: http://www.onlymelbourne.com.au/melbourne_details.php?id=638

Further inquiries issued to:
Mr. Kerry Stokes
Mr. David Leckie

Seven Corporate
Seven Network Limited 38-42 Pirrama Road
Pyrmont NSW 2009
Ph: (02) 8777-7777

Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Company
KKR Australia Pty LimitedLevel 42,
Gateway Building1 Macquarie Place
Sydney NSW 2000+(61) 2-8298-5500

Phil and John P. Moore Dig A Hole For Their Pathetic Selves...

Here's more hilarity and fodder for my libel case against Feldgrau.com... This was posted from our favorite clown Phylo/Ornebridges/... isn't it funny they accuse ME of using "sockpuppets" when each of THEM including Michael D. Miller use multiple names on the internet?? Anyway - this is interesting and I'll explain why after you read this crock of childish garbage...


by phylo_roadking on Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:19 am
All, with the emasculation...oooer, missus!...of PGV, this thread has come at last to a close.HOWEVER - this thread grew out of the investigation into "Directive 19" and "Honour Denied"...and with the unwitting assistance of a very important person in the plot - Paul Kenneth Harker himself - investigations into the books proceeds. The investigation into PGV and all associated, has - by definition - come to an end...but even as it did so, it came to an end with a flurry of VERY tasteless activity on PGV by "Author"......and it ALSO showed JUST how wrong and out of touch he is with the modern, Internet world.TWO things we should all bear in mind though...First of all - NEVER EVER underestimate the amount of data that is available out there in the big wide electronic world. I have been amazed - even with MY knowledge - by just HOW much was OPENLY available in records, data systems, websites etc. Mister Harker seems to have chosen to see someone hiding under the bed - when in actual fact, he simply didn't realise his life story was shining above the rooftops in neon lights. Public finance records, work records, copyright comfirmations, police records...it's all there to see openly and legally if you know how to look.That's a VERY bad assumption to make - and a very important fact to miss - "when first you set out to deceive" As I said before - the PC IS mighter today than either the pen or the sword...Secondly - this thread will stand in commemoration of the efforts of a considerable number of us here; not just those with valued and valuable input...but all of you who even just read the thread, and checked the detail for themselves. For a full six calendar weeks, PGV was rendered ineffectual by knowledge - REAL knowledge in the hands of REAL people, as opposed to faked and misrepresented fiction from the mouths of cardboard cutouts. And THAT is the business we're in here, all of us - REAL knowledge.

This is EXTREMELY articulate for a vinyl/pvc/rubber/strap-on wearing weirdo into rimming and watersports. However, his asinine statement of: "Public finance records, work records, copyright informations(sic), police records" is TRUE. However, he's going to end up owing me a lot of money because international law states that though these records may be public, NO ONE can reprint or reproduce them without the "EXPRESSED, ORAL OR WRITTEN CONSENT" of the person named in these records. This is where our favorite clown has incriminated himself in "Personal Privacy Invasion" offenses. Look it up - google it - ask a lawyer - I'm right. You're wrong. Thank you. I'll look forward to putting in a pool.

Laughably next is his statement: "This thread will stand in commemoration of the efforts of a considerable number of us here..." YES IT WILL! And your libelous posts will stand as testament to my victory. As we speak there are individuals being looked at in Belfast, Sterling, VA, Glensdie, PA, Redding, Ca. and we're nailing down locations for Slater and Munoz. Great job! Thanks for the thread on Feldgrau! You're burying yourselves!!!

I'm sure it makes Phylo "feel like a man" to THINK PGVet was "rendered inneffectual by knowledge" though the proper grammatical sentence would have been: "rendered inneffective by knowledge" (but pretty good attempt with your limited education!) - but PGVet has been temporarily and voluntarily closed down during the course of this lawsuit to prevent harassment and intimidation of its members - which HAS taken place and which HAS been reported by its members. Not to mention "backdooring" of the site, illegal password acquisitions, content alteration AND access. You might "think" you're good with a PC but you're really lousy. We have you dead to rights with breach times, log-in attempts, password breakers and logged site time. That's in a bundle and will go before a judge. How silly can someone be?

Now lets move on to another quote on Feldgrau by the rimming strap-on watersport lover:

"by phylo_roadking on Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:01 pm
It appears our friend has been at work again. Luckily, since I began this, I've occasionally Googled my various usernames the moment I became aware of Mister Harker's penchant for impersonation and sockpuppet users, and I've been doing it with increasing frequency.You should do it - Google your own name. It's fun! A while back I found a blog entry from a guy who was REALLY disgusted to find out when he Googled his own name that he shared the same surname with one Ed Easley....Early today I discovered Mister Harker's latest and less-than-professional comeback to all this; a number of rather tasteless accounts on various UK and international sex contact sites set up by someone on a U.S. IP address and using my various usernames on various sites as the account names. Fortunately - I don't care, except the freemail addresses they were opened from wouldn't have challenged any worthwhile mail to ME - AND in this modern age of identity theft and data security, webmasters react VERY well and very quickly to emails from a UK IP address about a supposedly UK profile on the sites concerned...except the accounts were opened by someone on a U.S. IP address... "

ENOUGH! EVERYONE!! DO YOURSELVES A FAVOR AND DECIDE WHO THE LIAR IS HERE! Contact Sex In The U.K. through their "Contact Us" tab and do what I did - simply request confirmation of whether or not the Ornebridges account was opened with a local U.K. IP address or a foreign one. As they told me - they'll tell you. The account was opened with a U.K. IP address, Northern Ireland. In my opinion Ornebridges is a little pervert who can't even get a date on the internet and now wishes to cover his sick tracks by blaming me for them. Look at my blog posts below. But again - if Ornebridges is telling the truth - answer these questions:

• How would I have known his personal email address to open the account?
• Why would I have opened the account MONTHS before my path crossed his?
• How would I have known his username?
• How would I have known his TextChat ID number?

I wouldn't have known or done any of the above. So I opened the accounts to discredit him?? Not at all. Phylo has discredited himself numerous times. I WELCOME ORNEBRIDGES/PHYLO TO CHALLENGE ME IN COURT ABOUT WHO OPENED THE ACCOUNTS. I HAVE THE PROOF. HE WON'T WANT YOU TO SEE IT NOR WILL THIS COWARD EMBRACE THIS CHALLENGE. HE KNOWS HE DID IT. HE KNOWS HE'S BLAMING ME FOR IT. IN MY OPINION HE'S A SICK, TWISTED, PERVERTED LITTLE COWARD WHO CAN'T AND WON'T COME FORWARD AND ADMIT IT. SAD... LAUGHABLE AND AMUSING... BUT SAD TOO....

"Oh pu - leeze, cover your tracks better. Find a decent proxy site or three...So - good try - but no cigar. As Hilary said to Bill... Really - is THIS the only way you can reply to ANY of the criticism of "Directive 19", "Honor Denied" and PGV??? By deploying you sockpuppets AGAIN? And do THESE numbers mean anything to you, Paul?docket no 01303-92 file #24431, def. id#57256; case no: 92 90088Think carefully now....1992 was a long time ago..."

Yep! Those numbers indeed mean something. Does DUI, Simple Assault, Failure To Pay Child Support or Failure To Appear mean anything to Feldgrau.com members?? I know it does. Oh what fun!! You're so right! The PC is an AMAZING tool!!


"by phylo_roadking on Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:47 pm
LOL no need for excuses when you have the truth behind you. Which is the one thing entirely lacking from Paul harker, so much so he's back to fabrications again. Which is sad, just reverting to type again. You'd thing EVERYTHING we'd found out at least deserved a NEW tactic of some sort??? BTW Michael, it's funny you should mention defences and magistrates.... "

Phylo - did you graduate from school? I'm just wondering because of your numerous spelling and grammar errors. I mean, you must be a REAL CREDIT to Feldgrau and your "professional historians and authors" when you can't even spell correctly or generate a proper sentence. Or are you reeling, backpeddaling and typing so fast to save face that you're just making mistakes in your confusion?

Yes it IS funny Michael D. Miller. You're going to need a good defense for a magistrate. Did I mention the ADL and ACLU are involved?? Oh... but YOU said you contacted them. No you didn't. I did. That's how I know you didn't.

You also said you contacted the Federal Trade Commission to complain about me. More lies. Nothing there. You also said you lodged complaints about my books for Consumer Fraud. Nope. Nothing shows there either. In fact, to lodge a complaint of Consumer Fraud you have to PROOVE that the product you're complaining about is falsely represented. You can't do that. You never could do that. So this is just more piss, wind, dog-and-pony-show smoke-and-mirrors from Feldgrau.com trying to convince the internet world that they know what they're talking about. You don't. But that's ok because my lawyer does.


"by John P. Moore on Fri Aug 22, 2008 4:58 pm
I just posted the following comments to Amazon. Brent Sampson is the publisher of Harker's hoaxes. I would think that Sampson would want to distance himself from Harker. I wonder what motivates him? On August 9 I sent the message below to Brent Sampson and have not had the courtesy of a reply. Draw your own conclusions.John MooreDear Mr. Sampson, I am moderator of the Authors forum on the Feldgrau Web site and have made some positive recommendations there about your "Sell Your Book on Amazon" You should also be aware of the negative publicity that one of your clients, Paul Harker, has been receiving that reflects unfavorably on you and your business since you have promoted his publications on Amazon.viewtopic.php?f=21&t=29227&start=0Best wishes,John P. Moore"

Thank you John P. Moore. Harker's Hoaxes? You stated the above as "context fact" rather than "opinion". Do you know that you just committed libel? Thank you! We had fun with this one today! Watch what you say! It's all about context, fact and opinion when you're printing and publishing statements. Show us your hard proof and evidence that my works are hoaxes. You can't because you don't have any. I have facts and data to back my works. The fact that I didn't share this research with you is what ticked you off. And by the way - you're also the one I corresponded with in CONFIDENCE from the Feldgaru.com site and YOU'RE THE ONE that shared my personal, private contact information with MICHAEL D MILLER who sent me numerous harassing, unsolicted and unwanted emails. You invaded my privacy with your carelessness. Why I wonder? No worries. I'll look forward to your answer in court.

Why doesn't Mr. Brent Sampson "distance himself" from me?? He's not! HE'S DISTANCING HIMSELF FROM YOU!! I'd expect a publisher would have a lot more clout, credibility and respect than some off-the-wall free-web-site-forum blowhard trying to be heard by people who don't care about what he has to say! As you said - "You'd think " he'd want to distance himself from me. That pretty much shows how much respectable people care about what YOU think!


"by phylo_roadking on Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:09 am
I note today that out friend has "closed" PGV according to the on-screen - AFTER removing the failed personal attack on me and others based on his faked evidence LMAO SImilarly, Wikianswers removed ANOTHER libellous attack on Feldgrau and others.

Sorry there "Superstar". You're wrong again - as usual. PGVet has been temporarily and voluntarily closed pending my litigation against Feldgrau.com. And Wikianswers DID NOT REMOVE A LIBELOUS ATTACK ON FELDGRAU - They shut down your asinine thread upon our request because you were publicly abusing ME and their system with your B.S. IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU OH WEARER OF RUBBER - IT WAS BECAUSE OF WHAT YOU DID THERE. And go to the library or take some night courses. I bet you can learn to spell and use proper grammar in no time at all!


THIS however is a gem - from his closing statement on PGV
The attacks include password hacking, altering of information and unauthorized access.... Our friend's behaviour in ALL of this - Directive 19, Honor Denied, PGV, SS-Armory, Medievalonline - can be summed up in ONE Gospel reference...Luke 13:26
By their works ye shall know them. And every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit, is hewn down and cast into the fireGetting warm, Paul?"

Now - do you quote the Bible while engaging in watersports too?

He seems to like us!!! free advertising LMAO

Yep! People have been emailing me with how much they enjoy your threads! You personally made a mockery out of Feldgrau, Phylo! Enjoy your self-adulation (or self-pleasuring or whatever it is you do... by the way... try eHarmony or Match.com... those sites are more respectable than the S&M whacko sites you post on!)


In closing for today - again we've seen what damage can be done by blind mice who pretend to be professionals. John P. Moore was respectable until he demeaned himself by engaging in this free-for-all and in so doing he committed libel himself. Follow your Clown-Leader Phylo if you will. He's doing Feldgrau an incredible disservice by making the site and its members able targets for legal action. Follow him if you will - as he marches down the avenue leading his libelous campaign while dressed in high heels, vinyl and while sporting a strap-on. I'm sure he looks good to himself but you need to see your little leader for what he is.

Feldgrau.com is a funny little web site that claims to be "apolitical" but yet they're overly concerned about me and my works. See these people for what they are. They've called me a "Neo-Nazi" and a "Nazi War Crimes Apologist". I'm neither. However, my books are about the Holocaust and "Feldgrau Management" doesn't want you to believe my books. We all know the Holocaust happened yet Feldgrau.com and their "professional authors and historians" have said my books aren't true. In my opinion they're openly denying the Holocaust by trying to convince you that books about it aren't true. Wasn't it the Nazis themselves who tried to burn and bannish books?

Finally - laugh at me and call this another boisterous lie if you will. But legal action is pending against you. It will take a few months for the process to ripen. I'm fine with that. I know what's going on. Apparently you don't. But as I've been advised - the statute of limitations for libel is 1 year. That means you're looking for a knock on your door from now until June 2009. It's coming.

Tuesday Update

Very good news today! The Feldgrau, Axis and Amazon threads have all been reviewed in depth. There are 5 individuals who have posted consistently who have made statements that qualify as libel. The leading offender is of course, Ornebridges. For now I'll spare the other 4 the humiliation of revealing their names. There are several others who posted and shared information about me that violates Invasion of Privacy laws.

So what happens now? Well, the printed remarks and the personal information go before a judge for review. I don't know how things work in your states and countries but New Jersey is very adamant about prosecuting these matters. The judge will then review the private information and libelous remarks. He might determine all or some of it is worthy of prosecution. Don't worry - the possibility of a judge determing "all" of it should be thrown out is impossible. There were some textbook violations committed here. Then the judge declares disclosure and this information is passed along to law enforcement agencies in your respective states and countries. You're then served papers and notification that you've been named in a lawsuit. Extradition isn't really important. We won't need you to be present to explain your remarks. We have them in printed and in web-published form. You can feel free to attend at your own expense and try to explain away your remarks if you'd like. At the conclusion of this a judgment will be awarded. It might be $1.00 in my favor or... you might work the rest of your lives while paying off a wage garnishment.

It seems that at least one of you believes I'll have to disprove everything you've said about me in order to be victorious in this matter. That's just not how it works. However, your neophyte explanations of the law and how it works are extremely amusing to professional lawyers. Once again - this isn't about ME or MY BOOKS. This is quite specifically about what YOU HAVE POSTED AND PRINTED ABOUT ME. They really are separate issues. This is also about the packages sent to my home, the harassing phone calls I've received, the sharing of my private information and a pornographic image that was emailed to us. Had you kept this about the books and not made it personal, things would have been ok for you. But you didn't. You took it a few steps beyond reasonable complaining and attacked me. That's what this is about.

I'd like to close today's post with a few references to Ornebridges' claim that I allegedly posted profiles for him on "multiple" sex web sites. Truth be told, I didn't. His profile on "Sex In The U.K." came up by an associate of mine when running a basic google search for "Ornebridges".

If I posted that profile of Ornebridges, his Feldgrau.com cronies and anyone reading this blog or the Amazon comments must answer these questions:

• Why would I have allegedly created that profile for him MONTHS before my path crossed with his?
• How did I know his private email address?
• How did I know his location?
• How did I know his private TextChat ID?
• Why does the page now read: "Ornebridges Has Deleted His Profile" rather than "Profile Deleted", "Profile Deleted By Moderators", etc??
• How and Why would the moderators of the web site delete a profile simply based on a random complaint from someone?

I took the steps to contact the web site to learn what their policy is for deleting an account. I encourage you to do the same thing to see that Ornebridges is lying about this. First of all, Ornebridges claimed this profile was opened from an American IP address. Sorry Ornebridges. It wasn't. Not according to Sex In The U.K. anyway. Nice try. The site administrators will only cancel a profile internally if they feel it's abuse of their system. In this case, the USER deleted the profile. End of story.

Addendum to Earlier Post

I just read through the latest Amazon threads and wanted to comment about how obvious it is that Ornebridges is reeling and backpeddaling. It's sad that someone has to go to such lengths and bounds to try to establish such a miscreant case against me. I'm saddened by it. I'm seriously starting to form concerns about his state of mind. That isn't meant as an insult. I'm seriously starting to wonder what would compel a person to rattle away like he has. He has now gone to the edge of reasonable behavior with his posts. He must have a strong need to be heard for he repeats himself over and over to the point where any cognizant person sees he is in need of attention. He likes to be heard. Unfortunately a web site, even Feldgrau.com, is only as respectable as its members. Claiming his status with "Feldgrau Management" and acting the way he has, only serves to cast shadows and humiliation on his web site associates. Maybe it's time one of his associates lets him know that he's maiming whatever integrity Feldgrau.com may have with his overly theatrical and shamefully pathetic behavior.

Ornebridges Tries Hard - But FAILS AGAIN!!

Well folks, here's more entertainment from our favorite clown Ornebridges. This is the latest garbage he posted on Amazon to "prove his credibility"....

"Further investigation confirmed that despite claiming a Medieval History degree from Penn State to the journalist Victor Greto, Paul Harker never attended Penn State. His military career ended in a few months without ANY service abroad, and his "career in counselling" turned out to amount to two years or so as receptionist in a teenage halfway house in Cape May, NJ. His ex-partner, when contacted, confirmed that NONE of the five years of travel to Europe to meet "Rolf Otto Schiller" took place, nor any of the correspondance Harker is supposed to have had with him; in the five years that Harker is supposed to have travelled over a dozen times to Europe - he pumped gas in a Texaco garage in Cape May.No research, no travel, no correspondence, so many errors...what about corroboration? recently yet ANOTHER harker sockpuppet tried to palm a number of faked documents off on Feldgrau management, one of which was supposed to confirm the existence of "Rolf Otto Schiller". This document - and all the rest - turned out to be kids'-level forgeries."Directive 19" is a tissue of lies; it's creation process was a tissue of lies, the claimed career and academic qualifications of Paul K. Harker...ditto. "

OK - Lets start with "Further Investigation". This guy just REALLY likes to sound official and intelligent, doesn't he? I'm simply going to ignore his first few ramblings because they're just so absurd as to be funny. I'll move right along to the crux of Ornebridges' "fact finding" with his comment: "His ex-partner, when contacted, confirmed..." Yeah.... good one. I guess I'm the only guy in the world who has an ex that ISN'T vindictive and who wouldn't like to see me suffer in some form or another. OK guys - what would YOUR ex's say about you if I asked them to describe you?? Great "fact finding" Ornebridges! Go to a hostile source and take the information you get at face value! You're quite a 'gifted" researcher aren't you?

So basically the above information from Ornebridges is a crock. Oh, except that I did pump gas at a Texaco Station for a while. But it's obvious that Ornebridges sees honest work as something to mock and make fun of. Hard times called for hard decisions. I wasn't too proud to earn an honest dollar. I guess Ornebridges sees the job of pumping gas as something demeaning. Isn't that sad?

I have NO IDEA who the "other sockpuppet" is supposed to be who "palmed documents off on Feldgrau" as I haven't sent them a single thing. However, Ornebridges was kind enough to list a string of Usernames on Amazon in one of his "save-face posts". I recognized a few of those names as associates of mine who not only worked with the books, but who are also individuals who think Axis and Feldgrau are laughable shams. Hey Ornebridges - use your super-duper high-powered computer skills to PROVE I sent those documents. You're GUESSING now and YOU KNOW YOU'RE MAKING RIDICULOUS ALLEGATIONS BASED SOLELY ON GUESSWORK!!! You KNOW you are! Because I sent you nothing! I wouldn't give you a single thing. Well, I will give you some attention here because in my opinion you obviously didn't get enough as a child. Your negative attention seeking is quite deplorable for a man your age. You obviously have NO IDEA of what you're talking about. All Ornebridges has done is make ridiculous accusation after ridiculous accusation and he hasn't proven a single thing. And I like his Freudian repeated use of the word "sockpuppets". After seeing his profiles, we can dare to imagine what he does with socks.

And finally, all his hogwash about "directly pinging my PC and identifying me by my IP number" is nothing but baloney. Anyone can ping anyone's PC and an IP number only gives a general area. Now if you truly DID identify me by my PC then you committed an invasion of privacy with an FCC regulated device and by misusing FCC regulated equipment.

What else have you got, Ornebridges? We're really enjoying your negative attention seeking behavior. I could counsel you about that and would be willing to do so for free. Is it possible that you're not really mad at me? Is it possible that you're redirecting your hostility and anger towards me due to some repressed event that happened in your childhood? Is it possible you're struggling with your sexuality? After all, we could spend quite a few hours talking about THAT. Keep trying. You haven't come close to anything that makes sense yet.

Ornebridges Childishly Denies His Posts - Runs Scared And Makes More Ridiculous Accusations

Here's the latest from Ornebridges. Get ready because this one is a laugh riot!

"As mentioned yesterday on Feldgrau, I found Mister Harker had created a number of sockpuppet accounts on various internet sex sites in my name, in an attempt to discredit me personally. Unfortunately it didn't work - nothing he has tied has ever worked LMAO. And these wre removed immediately on request...Why so quick and easy? Here's a hint, Paul - when you set up profiles on UK sites that are supposedly by UK citizens...it's a really REALLY good idea NOT to do so from a U.S.-originating IP address! And it's REALLY not a good idea to direct people to projectgermanveteran.we.bs .....WITH ITS BADLY-FAKED SCHILLER DOCUMENT!!!Now would you care to address the issues of your faked degree in Medieval History, your faked career in counselling, your faked travel to Europe, your faked correspondence with Schiller, your faked Schiller kennkarte, providing names of these "professionals" you showed proof of Schiller's existence to, providing proof of Schiller's existenc to us all here, provide references to all the documents you say were used or consulted, proving the existence of all those people on PGV....And by the way - try and do it PROPERLY? Try and avoiding creating ANY MORE SOCKPUPPETS and fake personas. Like yesterday, like all your fake sex contacts, like all your faked reviews on here, like all the faked people on AHF trying to provide provenance for faked militaria - try for just ONCE to actually answer the issues on hand instead of lying more.Honesty is the best policy. Even if it sticks in your throat."

His above post is just TOO hostile to be taken seriously. Come on Ornebridges. You KNOW you posted that profile on Sex In The U.K. I didn't post it to discredit you. I don't play that game. Obviously you'd like people to think that I do. But I'm not like you, Ornebridges. And now you write: "Unfortunately it didn't work - nothing he has tied (sic) has ever worked LMAO".

Good lord son! Your whole persona has changed in this post! Now you're typing so fast you're making spelling errors and now you're nervously using "LMAO" to create the illusion that you believe this is a laughing matter. It isn't. You're backpeddaling and trying to cover your perverse interests by blaming me for them. And what's news to me is that you said I supposedly created "several profiles of you on several U.K. sex web sites". REALLY??? Because your profile on Sex In The U.K. was the ONLY one that was brought to my attention - and I WASN'T THE ONE WHO FOUND IT!!! Someone else brought it to MY attention!!! So now, as you said, "Honesty is the best policy. Even if it sticks in your throat." (By the way - the words "sticks in your throat" seems to be a very Freudian admission of your interests.) So now, you and I both know I didn't create that profile. You may want your Feldgrau.com cronies to believe that - but you and I both know you put that profile there. And this just falls perfectly in suit with the extensive lying you have done so far.

So Ornebridges - would YOU like to go to court to prove I put that profile there?? I'd LOVE to go to court for that outcome! Would you? I didn't think so. You discredited yourself with that profile. And by the way, look at the screen captures of your profile. It says "ORNEBRIDGES HAS DELETED HIS ACCOUNT" - not - "THIS ACCOUNT HAS BEEN DELETED". You PERSONALLY went on the site and deleted it. The site moderators didn't do it! YOU DID! How did you have the password, etc if I supposedly created it? Looks like I just trapped you in your own lie there. Which of course draws everything else you've said about me and my books into suspicion. You might have your little Feldgrau.com members fooled but between you and me - YOU know you posted that profile.

And here are a couple of questions to knock more holes in your sinking ship of lies. How would I have POSSIBLY known your Text Chat ID address??? And most importantly - why would I have supposedly posted that profile MONTHS BEFORE YOU AND I CROSSED PATHS??? You see? Your answer - just like everything else you've said about me - doesn't make any sense at all and has no solid foundation.

Your most recent accusation here follows along with your ridiculous claim that I posted a negative review on one of Anthony J. Munoz's books a full year or two before my first book was published. That's absolutely ridiculous because at that time I had no idea he existed. But it somehow makes you feel better about yourself as a person to blame me for every shortcoming you and your little Feldgrau.com members have suffered. What's next Ornebridges? Are you going to blame me for the state of the economy and the high price of gas?

Directive 19

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.